Impact of Recent Changes in Capitalism on Social and Economic Status of Women

IntroductionThe history of wo man business office and their oppression has been well documented in literature. Several authors afford explored the origin of women oppression. Womens oppression has its root in roofism which has existed for many centuries (Stuart & Martin 1989). Their oppression is of course not ludicrous to capitalism as it has been there since the colonial times and through the nineteenth century and 20th. However, all all over the past few decades, we pay off observed world-shaking changes in capitalism which has stired on the precondition of women. Many changes contain been observed barely about of which argon positive and others which take a more than gloomy view. In this esteem, this paper explores how the recent changes in capitalism harbor affected the brotherly and economic placement of women. In particular, the paper considers how bit-Fordism and liberalism bemuse altered womens socio-economic position. Changes such as industrialization , urbanization, internationalization, globalisation and modern fontization allow be discussed in detail. The paper will examine how the concurrent pagan shifts nominate interacted with these socio-economic transformations and determine what the overall impact of these different factors has been. An exploration of this case will be incomplete without examining the origin of capitalism and the rise of post fordism and neoliberalism.History of capitalism and crisis of fordismThe origin of capitalism die hards shrouded in the mists of history. Its hire birth date is speculated to be anywhere between the 14th century and the 17th century (Stuart & Martin 1989). Capitalism emerged from a feudal society and is united to Europes economic carcass of the late 1700s (Price 2005). It is argued to deport begun with the landmark of common land used by peasants, and suppuration of merchant capital and slave trade in western Europe (Price 2005). Rich landowners appropriated common land and made it their own private land, thereby creating a landless exiting class which countenanced the needed mash to develop industries (Harvey 1989). Fordism, a government activity characterized by mass production, emerged in the early 20th century. It became dominant in the advanced capitalism during the postwar reconstruction. It was characterized by the mass production of homogeneous consumer products, use of rigid technology, increase productivity, rising income which is dependent on productivity, increase favorableness and investments, and homogenization and intensification of labour (Clarke 1990). Fordism gave birth to the current phenomenon of mass thespian. The fordist regime adopted a set of cultural norms and values which proceed to oppress women. The regime patronageed the priapic breadwinner model where women were seen as mothers and dwelling house wives while men worked in gainful labour (Castell 1996). gender traffic under this regime required women to work without pay while the priapic overpower was remunerated. However, fordist regime had its limits which were technical, amicable and economic in nature. Technical limits were in the first place the exhaustion and the intensification of labour (Clarke 1990). The economic limits included decrease in profitability which was a result of the rising nets and declining productivity. Social limits were related to the out maturement demands of mass worker.Post-fordism and neoliberalismGiven the crisis of fordism, a sunrise(prenominal) form of post-fordist regime emerged which was characterized by the evolution differentiation of products, new technologies, more flexible production methods, and great skill and flexibility, and increased involvement of women in paying(a) labour (Burrow & loader 2003). Post-fordism emerged primarily due to three main operate forces internationalization, technology revolution, and as a result of the paradigm shift from fordism to post-fordism (Br oomhill 2001). Introduction of the welf atomic number 18 system and the rise of women movement in the post-fordist regime take to the abandonment of the masculine breadwinner model and womens financial independence (Broomhill 2001). Several historical events collect transformed the social landscape including technological revolution, demise of international commie movement and the collapse of Soviet statism (Castell 1996). Proliferation of technologies centred on information systems crap reshaped the social landscape and accelerated the pace of schooling of the society. Moreover, the rise of globalization has led to a new form of relationship between states and economies (Castell 1996). All these changes acquire been driven and shaped by the neo-liberal thought. liberalism has led to the increasing globalization, decentralization, de-regulation of the market, organizational restructuring, proceeds and consolidation of transnational corporations, and light marketization whic h has reduced the old state and contractual controls (Acker 2004). Furthermore, new forms of flexibility in employment relations including part-time and online forms of working call for emerged, changing the working environment. Post-fordism and neoliberal policies stick out resulted in the feminisation of labour and made men and women both similar in the humanity sphere (Broomhill 2001).Impact on womens economic and social positionThese changes in capitalism have had profound yet contradictory impact on the economic and social status of women. epoch it has to a hulking extent improved womens socio-economic status by undermining older forms of male dominance, it has to well-nigh extent worsened their life conditions (Beck et al. 2001). On the positive side, post-Fordism and neoliberalism have altered womens socio-economic position and disrupted the settled economies that supported patriarchate structures. Post-fordist relations of production have resulted in the inclusion bo dy of women in paid labour force. neoliberal policies have increased flexibility in employment. These changes have changed the way women view themselves and challenged the patriarchic view of domination of women by the men (McRobbie 2008). And since domination essentially occurs through construction of human beings, if the women subjects do not internalize agedism, then its demise is just a matter of time. piece of music some religion in some countries, especially Islam, continue to re-state the sanctity of the patriarchal family, its disintegrations is plain in many countries. Women in many countries have fall in the paid workforce and even conquered legal parity at work. However, their inclusion in the paid labour force does not necessarily predict that they were relieved of the burden of Partriachalism. It might be that de injure working for pay, women notwithstanding continue with their role of providing domestic and caring labour at home. Nonetheless, their carrier bag from oppression is clearly evident across the globe. The number of women in paid workforce has been increasing gradually over the years. Estimates indicate that women currently mark for about 42% of the global workforce with majority of them employed in the health sector (75%) (WHO 2008). Not plainly has their economic status improved, their social status has improved as well. Women are increasingly being seen as equals to men including in politics where they were essentially absent. The political system in many countries has granted up to female leaders. The participation of women in leadership positions and politics is clearly evident in the recent presidential elections in the US where Hillary Clinton contested against President Barack Obama. Many more women leaders have emerged all over the world with President Ellen Johnson Sirleaf of Liberia being the most touristyly known in Africa, having won as the first ever female president in Africa. Others include the German chanc ellor Angela Merkel, President Cristina Fernandez of Argentina, blossoming minister Sheikh Hasina of Bangladesh, President Dilma Rousseff of Brazil and many more (Aguirre et al. 2012). The magnetic inclination is certainly endless. In addition, the education system has become more open to the girl child including in fundamentalist countries such as Iran which have seen a growing number of women graduates (Castell 1996). The affirmation and light of womens values, the growing women movements and number-up of patriarchalism are some of the most important transformations that have contributed to the new status of women.FeminismAs women movements continue to fight for their autonomy and science of womens values, the more has feminism diversified. A new limit has emerged ground on the notion of de triping of the society which implies a society free from gender associations or rather one that moves beyond gender (Murphy 2011). This new frontier in feminism has superseded the old battles that existed between equality feminism and variation feminism. By mobilizing women to oppose patriarchalism and to defend their rights, feminism has transformed to the point of canceling the notation between men and women (Sulivan 2007). Men and women are now largely viewed as individuals with meaningful existence, liberating them from the patriarchic burden of responsibilities. This has certainly been very helpful in achieving a more equal society. Womens role in the development of the economy is increasingly being recognized. Available evidence indicates women to be decently drivers of economic growth. A study by the Center for Economic and policy Research found the high rate of women employment to be the driving force of the US economy. The study found that, if women had not entered the workforce over the last 30 years, the economy would have been 11% less. Today, we see several(prenominal)(prenominal) institutions including the World Bank and the Department for Inter national Development (DFID) campaigning for more involvement of women in economic development (Aguirre et al. 2012). According to the World Bank, boost the growth of women entrepreneurs is as sure way of fighting poverty. Women are self-collected to drive the global economy in the next coming decades. Estimates indicate that nearly 1 billion of women across the world might core paid labour over the coming decade (Aguirre et al. 2012).CriticismWhile there calculates to be a occur in womens socio-economic status driven by post-fordist relations and the neoliberal policies pursued by the several states, some countries continue to follow partriarchalism. Despite its inevitable demise, some countries persist to put away follow partriarchal lines which subordinate women under mens dominance. A good example can be seen with Saudi Arabia. A charwomans place in Saudi Arabia is still in the home. Saudi women continue to walk in the shadow of their men. For example, despite their pe rspicuous presence, they are not allowed to participate in the humanity sphere (Hamdan 2005). They are viewed as non-existing in the in the public eye(predicate) sphere and are silenced in public life. They continue to be subordinated to male individuals in both private and public sectors despite their qualifications. While a progress seems to have been made with respect to their education, at the core of womens education is sex segregation. Education in Saudi continues to support the prevailing gender structures, implying lower social status of Saudi women (Hamdan 2005). Perhaps more shocking discussion is the fact that Saudi Women are not allowed to drive. While religious reasons are generally attached for denying women the right to drive, it is clear that their place is still in the home. besides, even though many women have progressed economically due to their inclusion in workforce, only a few of them work in the management positions. In spite of the increasing number of w omen in workplace, many of them are unvoiced in the lower-status occupations. For example, while the health sector comprise of 75% of the women workforce, they are concentrated n the lower status working either as nurses and tocology personnel or as caring cadres (WHO 2008). They are largely underrepresented at the managerial train and specialist categories such as dentists, pharmacists, and physicians. Feminist critique of sexism seems to have given justification to new forms of exploitation and oppression. With more women connection the paid workforce, the family wage model central to state-organized capitalism which viewed men as the breadwinners and women as home reservers has now been replaced by the newer, more modern norm of two-earner family (Fraser 2013). While this may sound like good news, the reality is that post-fordism and neoliberal conceptions have resulted in depressed wage levels, increased job insecurity, aggravation of double shifts and the increase in the number of working hours (Fraser 2013). What was once the family wage in capitalism has now been replaced by a low-waged work. Majority of their work has not really brought liberation rather a tedious reality far from the perceived image of a working woman (Frank 1999). They remain relegated to lower positions at work. Even with many women being employed either in full or part-time positions, they are not acquire to the top. Also, where their role is clearly evident, women continue to admit from some level of hostility and public disapproval. For example, when it comes to journalism, women have proved flexible and able to fudge new nestlees. Their adaptability to new approaches is clearly evident with their news coverage of the family 11 events, the overthrow of Taliban forces and the bombing of Afghanistan (Chambers 2004). Women journalists developed different angles in their approach to war journalism, thereby attracting more news audiences. until now despite the slender role that they played, a heated public debate emerged about the risks of reportage in war zones. It is clear that despite their liberation from oppression, women are still defined in terms of men. As wives and mothers, women clearly continue to suffer from some level of hostility and public disapproval that men with families do not ( Chambers 2004 p.13) In addition, some recent events have pointed to the re-create crisis of capitalism. There is currently a crisis of profitability which is facing capitalism. The profit rate are falling and many firms have been laying off workers. British capitalism is particularly in a crisis given its relatively faded position compared to other imperialist nations (FRFI 2013). The current focus on the growth of the private sector implies that priority has been placed on industrial development over social objectives. Workers wages have been cut to a abundant extent and unemployment seems to be growing. Given this crisis, capitalism is now insisting on women returning to their traditional roles as domestic workers (FRFI 2013).neoliberal ideas contributing to sexismWhile the recent changes experienced by capitalism seem to have contributed to the recognition of women as gender equals, recent developments continue to enact sexism. For example, many advertisements of at once show nude pictures of women. What this means is that the male gaze is invited and encouraged as women continue to become objects of the gaze. Moreover, many clubs continue to feature youngish women stripping, lap-dancing and newsbreak out their breasts in public (McRobbie 2009). A hyper-culture of commercial sex seem to be growing, an aspect that is clearly a repudiation of feminism. Even the young women journalists who through their education are gender aware refuse to designate such acts of commercial sexuality. It seems like the new female Subject is called upon by the society to withhold critique and to remain silent despite her freedom. Consumer and po pular culture seem to be introducing invidious forms of gender re-stabilization by simulation to support female success yet tying the female subject to new post- libber neurotic dependencies (McRobbie 2009). In order to be considered a modern sophisticated girl, the female subjects choose to withhold their critique despite their obvious image as sexual objects of mens gaze. With the progress seen with womens socio-economic status, one might think that the feminists are happy to see the things they fought so hard to have come true. However, what has emerged is different from what was desired (Cornwall et al 2008). Neoliberal values seem to have created space under which women can be besides oppressed and their core values undermined. The culture of neoliberalism has led to the idea of self-sufficiency and free choice. All that one has to do is to compete in the market place. Some women have even gone to great lengths to make themselves acceptable to the world of work by performing cosmetic operating theatre under the illusion of having freedom choice to make their own decisions (Gupta 2012). Yet some of their work goes against their core values. Many women have ventured into the sex constancy under the illusion of having control over their lives. They have chosen this signifier of work in the spirit of freedom of materialisation of their sexuality and intrust that the work is liberation from the drudgery of cleaning jobs (Gupta 2012). However, the so called freedom of expression is actually reducing them to the status of commodity and as objects of men gaze. Feminism which once fought for the liberation of women from oppression has become entangled in a dangerous liaison with neoliberal efforts to build a free market society (Fraser 2013). It has led to the notion of freedom of choice which last has given rise to whoredom. Feminists perspective on prostitution, however, is an interesting one. Feminists argue that prostitutes are social workers and have in fact used their social concepts to establish for decriminalization of prostitution (Sullivan 2007). Feminists have formed strong links with prostitutes resulting in advances in the area of prostitution law reform. The feminist position of the sex industry is one that empowers women as long as they choose to participate. merely what is progressive about womens participation in prostitutionCan women really progress by becoming sexual objects and objects of male gazeWhat is revolutionary about legalizing prostitutionIn fact, legalizing prostitution just makes women to become sexual commodities. The fight against sexism that has long been fought for by feminists seems to have ended up again to encouraging it. The progress in women that we have seen so far will not continue if women continue to follow neoliberal ideology that values individual choice and freedom over emancipation. Selling their bodies will not provide them with independence and empowerment that they look but rather it will just reinforce male power and privilege.Trafficking of women and childrenFurther, neoliberal ideology has led to the growing trafficking of women and children. This is particularly evident in Asia and the pacific region where human trafficking has grown to become a golden business. Millions of children in the pacific region are traded to work in brothels or sweatshops. Human trafficking has not grown by accident but as a result of free trade and structural adjustments brought about by neo-liberalism. Sex trafficking is currently a growing market in some parts of Eastern Europe, most notably Romania and Albania (FRFI 2013)ConclusionThere is no doubt that the socio-economic status of women has improved following the recent changes in capitalism. This is evident in their inclusion in the paid workforce, their enrollment in eductation and increased participation in the public sphere including in politics. However, to some extent, these changes have painted a gloomy picture wit h regard to the status of women. A vast majority of them continue to occupy positions at the low levels of the organization. Also they continue to suffer from some level of hostility and public disapproval. Neoliberal ideology has led to their increasing commodification and increased trafficking of women and children. A hyper-culture of commercial sexuality seem to be growing, an aspect that is clearly a repudiation of feminism. Nonetheless, a huge progress has been made. Today, there are many successful women in the capitalist society. In fact, many women seem to have embraced the capitalism and showed support of it due to their improved social and economic status. If their status is to be further improved in post-fordist employment, policy initiatives must address the issues of womens employment, skills and rearing (Burrows & Loader 2003). Furthermore, there is need for public policy to challenge the polarized labour market that has emerged from post-fordism. Neo-liberal policies which support the development of a polarized market are socially divisive. Also, feminist scholars need to caution Women against prostitution. Selling their bodies will not provide them with independence and empowerment that they seek but rather it will just reinforce male power and privilegeReferenceAcker, J., 2004. Gender, capitalism and globalization. Critical Sociology, vol. 30 (1), pp.17-41Aguirre, D., Hoteit, L., Rupp, C. and Sabbagh, K., 2012. Empowering the third billion women and the world of work in 2012. Booz & CompanyMcRobbie, A., 2008. The Aftermath of Feminism Gender, culture and social change, pp. 1-95.Zygmunt, B., 2001. The Individualized Society. law press.Beck, Ulrich & Elizabeth Beck-Gernsheim, 2001. Individualization institutionalized individualism and its social and political consequences. Sage publishers.Broomhill, R., 2001. Neoliberal globalism and the local state a regulation approach. Journal of Australian Political Economy , No.48Burrow, R. and Loader, B. D., 2003. Towards a post-fordist welfare stateLondon RoutledgeCastells, M., 1996. The Power of Identity. BlackwellCastells, M., 1996. The Rise of the net Society. BlackwellChambers, D., Steiner, L and Fleming, C., 2004. Women and journalism. RoutledgeClarke, S., 1990. The crisis of Fordism and the crisis of capitalism. University of Warwick.Cornwall, A., Gideon, J. and Wilson, K., 2008. Introduction reclaiming feminism gender and neoliberalism. IDS Bulletin, vol. 39 (6)Franks, S., 1999. Having None of It Men, Women and the approaching of Work, Granta.FRFI, 2013. Womens oppression under capitalism. Revolutionary Communist Group viewed on 3rd whitethorn 2014 available from http//www.revolutionarycommunist.org/index.php/women-s-oppression/2850-women-s-oppression-under-capitalismGupta, R., 2012. Has neoliberalism knocked feminism sidewaysviewed on 3rd May 2014 available from http//www.opendemocracy.net/5050/rahila-gupta/has-neoliberalism-knocked-feminism-sidewaysHamdan, A., 2005. Wome n and education in Saudi Arabia challenges and achievements. International Education Journal, vol.6 (1), pp.42-64Harvey, Da., 1989. The learn of Postmodernity. Blackwell.Jessop, B., 2008. Post-fordism and the state, UK, LancasterMurphy, M., 2011. A progressive dialogue building a progressive feminist movement in neo-liberal times. viewed on 3rd May 2014 available from http//rabble.ca/news/2011/10/progressive-dialogue-building-progressive-feminist-movement-neo-liberal-timesPrice, R.G., 2005. Understanding capitalism part IV Capitalism, culture and society. Viewed on 2nd May 2014 available from http//www.rationalrevolution.net/articles/capitalism_culture.htm Stuart, H and Martin J, 1989. New Times The ever-changing Face of Politics in the 1990s.Lawrence & Wishart Whelan, Imelda, 2000. Overloaded Popular Culture and the time to come of Feminism, The Womens Press.Sullivan, B., 2007. Feminist approaches to the sex industry. Australia University of Queensland World Health Organization (W HO), 2008. Gender and health workforce statistics. World Health Organization.